May 21, 2012

Who needs experts when you have lawyers?

Illinois Boy Dies in Ambulance during Hospital Transfers

Seven-year-old Aaron Pointer spoke his last words from the back of an ambulance.

“I . . . am . . . tired . . . of . . . breathing,” the asthmatic boy gasped, taking breaths between each word, according to a nurse’s report.

This is certainly a tragic story, and a terrible way to do die. It’s also a very important lesson for us EMS folks that regularly do inter-facility transfers. Incidents like this are why it’s important to determine if a patient is stable for transport and stand your ground if you don’t feel comfortable. While I don’t know any details outside of the media’s report (and you know how much I trust the media), I do know a situation like this would have probably required a specialized transport team, or better yet, air transport. This is of course assuming that said resources were available at the time. Once again, information that the media fails to provide.

When investigating cases like this, we always have the luxury of spending all the time we need to gather the facts and determine if the treatment was appropriate. It’s an unfair advantage that lawyers and administrative folks have, but that’s life. And that’s why we do the job that we do. We train to be able to make these decisions within minutes, if not seconds. Unfortunately, like this article points out, things don’t always go the way we want them to and we find ourselves in this position.

By no means am I criticizing the work of the paramedics on this call. I have been there, and I would be lying if I told you that I have never taken a chance with transports like this. Sometimes your only choices are to take the patient, or let them die at the facility they are at. It’s a bad position that none of us want to be in. As the article mentioned, the hospitals both transported the patient out because the treatment they had available wasn’t enough for his condition. I think the real questions we need to ask are: Why 3 hospitals? Did the kid present better at the first hospital, not necessarily raising any flags that warranted a 45-minute trip? Was there a specialty transport team available? What interventions did the hospitals and EMS attempt before the kid deteriorated?

Like I said before, it’s important to evaluate these cases carefully before initiating long transports. In a situation where the hospital simply can’t provide the treatment the patient needs, then “standing your ground” might mean to demand that a nurse or RT accompany you. If the patient is that bad, talk to the doctor about placing an advanced airway prior to leaving the hospital. These are all things that might have have been done, but we will probably never know for sure.

“Intubating a 7-year-old is difficult in the best of circumstances, much less in an ambulance,” during a long ride, said the family’s lawyer, Joseph Miroballi. “It’s a disaster waiting to happen. It’s a formula for death.”

This is where I typically start getting irritated when reading stories like this. Lawyers acting as medical experts. If intubating a 7-year-old is really “difficult at best”, then I must be the king of pediatric airways. Then again, a lawyer attempting to intubate a child WOULD be very difficult, so maybe his statement had some truth to it.

“They send him even though he’s not stable,” he said. “Why they didn’t put a doctor in that ambulance with him, or an anesthesioloist or someone who would manage his condition during that long transfer, we don’t know.”

I don’t even know where to begin with this one. Has anyone ever had a doctor, much less, an anestesiologist ride in with you during a transport? Yes, it sounds like the level of care available on the ambulance wasn’t sufficient, but sometimes I think the expectations placed on us are a bit unreasonable. Many ER’s, especially rural ones, only have 1 physician. So what do we do? Close down the ER so the doc can ride in?

There are so many factors not addressed in this story that it’s pretty much impossible to determine if anyone really did anything wrong. But hey, why let facts get in the way of a good story?


A Boy Named Sue

Once upon a time lived a boy named Sue. He was well known as the bully around town. Sue was quite the perfectionist. It was understood that when you are in Sue’s territory you play by his rules. One wrong look and you better hold on to your lunch money for dear life, because Sue would have you roughed up and broke before you even knew what hit you.

On the other side of the neighborhood lived a boy named Doc. Now Doc was quite the opposite. He spent his days helping people with their various issues. A problem solver if you will. As a matter of fact, other kids were willing to pay Doc to help them with their problems. He was good at what he did and had a heart of gold. Unfortunately Doc wasn’t perfect. Sometimes he made mistakes, and that often made the other kids mad.

One day came and a kid named Pat had a problem that Doc just couldn’t solve. Pat became very upset as he paid Doc all of his lunch money and didn’t get what he wanted. Pat decided to track down Sue and see what he could do to help. Sue assured him that he would get his money back, as long as he got to keep half. Pat couldn’t resist the offer and decided to take him up on the deal. So Sue tracked down Doc, roughed him up and took all his money. As a matter of fact he took more money than Pat gave him to begin with. Pat ended up getting all of his money back and Sue kept the rest.

Now Doc eventually recovered and went back to his business of helping people. That is until one day Pat returned and requested his services again. Not really sure what to do, Doc agreed to help him. Once again Pat wasn’t very happy with the service he received. Pat once again called upon Sue to get him his money back. Only this time Doc called upon his friend Sharky to defend him in his time of need.

Sharky stood up to Sue and saved Doc from losing all of his money again. This continued until one day Sharky realized that he was providing a valuable service for Doc. A service this good was worth some form of reimbursement. After all, if Doc didn’t have Sharky to help, then he would lose all of his money every time Sue came around. Eventually it got to the point where it cost more money to have Sharky help, then to just give Sue what he wanted. This of course made for hard times with Doc.

More and more kids were getting the idea that they could just call Sue to get what they wanted out of Doc. Of course Doc couldn’t stand to lose all of his money as he had to have something to buy his lunch with. So Doc decided to ask for more money in exchange for solving peoples problems. As the cycle continued, many people couldn’t afford to pay Sue anymore and therefore would not seek his services. Even with the small number of kids that were actually paying Doc for his services, his high prices still provided for enough money to buy lunch.

Times were tough, but Doc managed to eat everyday. That is until the kids that didn’t have enough money to pay Doc called upon Sue to help them with their problems. Sue then told Doc that whether or not the kids had money, he was going to help them unless he wanted to get roughed up and robbed again. Unfortunately it got to the point where Doc was helping every kid in the neighborhood and only a couple kids were actually willing to pay him for his service.

Eventually Doc just couldn’t keep helping people. The constant fear of Sue coming around finally got the best of him. He had no choice but to quit trying to help people and find another way to earn his lunch money.