May 21, 2012

EMS 2.0 – Be careful what you wish for

I had a great conversation with a fellow EMS blogger last night over Skype. We discussed several ways to implement changes to our “broken” ems system and how EMS 2.0 could not only fix our industry, but improve healthcare as a whole. All was good as we were fixing the world and saving lives all through the wonders of internet phone calls. This was of course, until we came to a shocking realization of what EMS 2.0 could actually mean for us as an industry. I’ll get to that in a minute.

If you have worked in EMS for any period of time, you are no stranger to 911 abuse. People using 911 to seek routine, non-emergent medical care have tied up paramedic ambulances, increased costs and delayed response times. The “you call we haul” system that we have in place decreases liability as everyone is transported to an ER physician, but it doesn’t exactly use resources efficiently. As Justin Schorr mentioned on the Happy Hour, “putting more paramedic ambulances on the street is like putting more tow trucks at a dangerous intersection. We need to fix the intersection”.

Everyone has probably heard this rant from me or any of my fellow EMS bloggers at some point in time. Regardless of the specific solution we have in mind, we can all agree that we want patients to be routed to appropriate care. Not just the ER via paramedic ambulance. One thing me and @Jeramedic discussed was the possibility of using advice nurses in conjunction with EMS dispatch to properly route these people to appropriate care. A tactic that HMO’s have been doing for years. Here is a great article on a service that has already attempted to implement such a system.

So now for the scary part.

Let’s say that one day we woke up and our dreams came true. Patients are being routed to appropriate levels of care. Paramedics have the ability to refer non-emergent patients to urgent cares, clinics, etc. Now our ALS ambulances are only being used to transport the truly ill and injured patients to the ER. Sounds great right? We have successfully decreased the workload on our EMS system. There is only one problem. What are we going to do with all those paramedics that were once responding to 12+ calls a day? If we are only transporting truly emergent patients, wouldn’t that significantly decrease the demand for paramedics? Would this leave a bunch of paramedics looking for work?

I’ll use the fire service as an example. Over the years, fire prevention and regulations have worked so well that fire departments aren’t exactly putting out fires anymore. At least not very often. They damn near prevented themselves out of jobs. Is this what we are doing to EMS?

Fire departments did a great job of overcoming this problem by integrating fire suppression with EMS response. It has done wonders for fire services around the nation. This is actually a great example of how we as EMS professionals can use EMS 2.0 to our advantage and not only advance our career, but increase demand. Programs like community-based paramedics, and advanced-care paramedics would open up a whole new world of opportunity for EMS professionals to advance in the profession. This would also be an opportunity to increase educational standards, scope of practice and improve EMS salaries. You would see EMS turn from a stepping-stone job to a life-long career.

If you haven’t had a chance to listen to Episode 88 of the EMS Garage, you should do so now. We had some great discussion on this very topic. Hopefully Justin will hijack another show in the near future so we can get further into this discussion.


Patients, customer service and EMS 2.0 on the Garage

A last minute Skype call from @happymedic landed me in the middle of a great episode of the “Happy Hour” via the EMS Garage podcast. I was fortunate enough to join @happymedic, @podmedic, @imagemedic and @setla in discussing some hot EMS topics. @happymedic kicked off the show by telling a story about how his department ended up creating a definition of the word “patient”. This was a bit of a shock to us all as we have never really thought of what exactly makes a person a “patient”.

The best definition of a “patient” that I could come up with was anyone who requests service or presents with some sort of a chief complaint. Have you ever thought about what makes a person a “patient”?

We followed up with talks about transport destination decisions and ways to address abuse on the 911 system. We ended our show with some updates on Chronicles of EMS and the future plans for the project.

I really appreciate the opportunity to have been included on the show and I hope to join everyone again for great discussion and debate. In case you didn’t know, the EMS Garage can be found at http://www.emsgarage.com.

Check it out and be sure to listen in every week!


Abuse – behind the scenes look at healthcare costs

Everyone seems to be talking about how we can fix our “broken” healthcare system. Yet, nobody seems to talk about why healthcare is so expensive in the United States. You can blame it on insurance or the government. But what it really all comes down to is abuse and law suites.

Abuse and law suites are like siblings when it comes to health care. Massive amounts of people abuse our emergency rooms, ambulance services and even clinics. This is allowed to happen because these people can’t be denied medical care as the medical providers will find themselves in legal trouble.

Of course the people abusing our medical system typically have government aid, or don’t pay at all. Medicaid and Medicare programs are only reimbursing 20-30 cents on the dollar right now. That’s pretty bad considering what it costs to do business in healthcare. So what do the providers do to make up this lost revenue? They raise their prices! Which ultimately means that the private insurance companies get shafted with the high rates. When people abuse the system and don’t pay their bills, the healthcare providers lose money on supplies, wages, procedures, etc. It’s no wonder that the majority of private doctors offices and clinics don’t accept government insurance programs. Why would they?

Law suites closely follow abuse on the “rising healthcare costs” scale. Excessive medical malpractice suites have driven malpractice insurance through the roof. Once again, the doctors have to make up this loss somewhere. It is actually rare to find a doctor who has yet to have a malpractice suite filled against them. Whether the suit is legit or not, it is typically easier and cheaper for the insurance companies to just settle and pay up rather than fight it out in court. Excessive malpractice suites then lead to “defensive medicine”. Ordering expensive unnecessary tests to “cover their asses”. Once again, only contributing to rising medical bills. Doctors wont follow their training and instincts in fear of legal repercussions.

Does this mean that a doctor who shows gross negligence shouldn’t be held liable for their actions? Absolutely not. But suing your OB/GYN because your baby came out with 6 fingers isn’t what I would call reasonable.

Throwing more money at the problem doesn’t fix anything. We need to attack this problem from the ground up. Hospitals need to be able to deny treatment to non-urgent patients. They crowd our emergency rooms and eat up useful resources. Perhaps some public education and readily available low-cost clinics and urgent cares would tackle a good portion of this problem. The other thing that needs to be addressed is the idea that being transported by ambulance will get you seen faster. One of the big ideas behind EMS 2.0 is that EMS professionals could offer other solutions, rather than just transport to an emergency room. These are just a couple things that could significantly reduce the cost of healthcare.

Let’s quit covering up these problems and attack the real issues. Think of it like treating an illness. You can treat the symptoms and give some temporary relief. Or you can correct the core of the problem and fix it all together.


Chronicles of EMS Episode 1 Review



Chronicles of EMS – The Reality Series (Season 1 Episode 1) from Thaddeus Setla on Vimeo.

The wait is over. The much anticipated first episode of “Chronicles of EMS” is now available for viewing. I must start off by saying that I am very impressed with the quality of work done by the group. I am very excited to see more episodes as they arrive. Just watching the first episode really opened my eyes to many differences and similarities between the system in San Fransisco and system that I currently work in.

For starters, I noticed that Justin walked many of his patients to the ambulance. In the area where I work, that is against our policy. We aren’t supposed to walk patients at all. Obviously what he is doing is working for him and we do works for us. It’s just one example of how we all take different approaches to achieving the same goal.

Another thing I noticed was his short radio reports. I’m not sure if this was a result of cuts in the video during the edit, or just how medics give report in that system. We typically try and keep our reports under 30 seconds, but we also include a lot of information that isn’t exactly needed “right now”.

I guess it doesn’t matter if you live in San Fransisco, New York, Texas or anywhere for that matter. We all run the same patients. The system, protocols, equipment, and colors on the ambulance all change. The only thing that remains the same is the patients and the emergencies. This is why I believe that the Chronicles of EMS will be a huge success.

If you are reading my blog and haven’t checked it out. DO IT. It’s a great piece to watch, and I’m sure that it will continue to grow and improve. The concept of EMS 2.0 is growing right before our eyes thanks to the hard work of this group. I really hope to see more people become involved and interact to share their stories and maybe even bring Chronicles of EMS to their home town.

Take the time and check it out. You wont be disappointed! http://www.chroniclesofems.com

Also feel free to join the discussion about #CoEMS on twitter. Follow Chronicles of EMS on Twitter!