May 18, 2012

If my heart monitor could talk, I would have to shoot it…

The service that I work for recently made a rather large purchase of new heart monitors. We are switching from the Zoll “M” series monitor to the Zoll “E” series. This of course comes with a ton of neat upgrades. Built in c02 Capnography, NIBP, and 12-lead monitoring are all new features that come with the devices.

There is one feature that I forgot to mention…..

The monitors record the Sp02, c02, NIBP and ECG for the entire call. They also have Bluetooth capabilities and sync the entire call to our electronic PCR’s. You heard that right, big brother is coming to town!

Before I get to far into this post, I will say that I am 100% for recording and keeping the data, but I’ll get into that later.

I heard several people say that they are troubled by the new devices because they feel like they are being “watched” or “spied on”. Many paramedics fear that the feature will lead to a lot of “Monday night quarterbacking”, or questioning of paramedics practices if you will. I personally believe that the people that fear this system are just not comfortable with their own skills. I am actually quite bothered by this response and can’t help but wonder if it will have some negative impact on the care provided by the “affected paramedics”.

Ever get the feeling that your being watched? Have you ever noticed that you don’t act like yourself when you know you are being watched or recorded? Well imagine that feeling being applied to every ALS call you run. My fear is that some paramedics are going to second guess themselves to the point where nothing gets done. Unfortunately everyone always assumes that surveillance is a bad thing.

Lets look at an example on how closer monitoring of patient care can be helpful:

Have you had a patient present to you one way on scene, and completely change either en route or at the time you arrive at the ED? If you have, then you have most likely had the nursing staff or the ER doctor question your assessment or treatment. Rather than just saying “you weren’t there”, you can show them solid evidence and spare yourself from being the topic of their conversations for the rest of the day.

ECG recording can be used to improve QA programs, defend yourself in court and help the hospital staff continue the care that you started. Having someone review your calls and ECG interpretation will ultimately help you. It is far better to have someone correct an issue, than let it go without being addressed, and possibly harming someone. If you feel that uncomfortable with your knowledge or skills, then read up and get confident!

Don’t be afraid of big brother. He’s really there to help.


  • http://twitter.com/briteburningblu Leslee

    Hmm… I get what you’re saying about the second guessing, but I’m wondering if there aren’t more medics that are freaked out over this cuzz they’re lazy. I’m not saying that medics don’t do what they’re supposed to or anything of that nature, and I’m SURE you’ve come across your fair share of of crews who think that they’ve been around long enough to do things “their way” cuzz, really, who’s gonna tell them no? (And I think that applies to new AND seasoned crews.) At least with the recording going on, they won’t be as likely to not do everything that they’re supposed to.

    Over all, I think it’s gonna be a good thing. I know that we’ve got the technology to transmit to the hospitals around here and we have for quite some time. However, the hospitals aren’t so quick with the getting of technology. :-P Hopefully that will be remedied soon. I think it’s gonna make things a lot better for everyone.

    • http://www.medicmadness.com Sean Eddy

      You make a great point. We have our select medics that feel that protocols
      are merely a suggestion. While they may be good at what they do, it won’t
      amount to anything when placed in front of a judge.

      We also have the abilities to transmit, but like you, we are also waiting on
      the hospitals.

  • http://twitter.com/briteburningblu Leslee

    Hmm… I get what you're saying about the second guessing, but I'm wondering if there aren't more medics that are freaked out over this cuzz they're lazy. I'm not saying that medics don't do what they're supposed to or anything of that nature, and I'm SURE you've come across your fair share of of crews who think that they've been around long enough to do things “their way” cuzz, really, who's gonna tell them no? (And I think that applies to new AND seasoned crews.) At least with the recording going on, they won't be as likely to not do everything that they're supposed to.Over all, I think it's gonna be a good thing. I know that we've got the technology to transmit to the hospitals around here and we have for quite some time. However, the hospitals aren't so quick with the getting of technology. :-P Hopefully that will be remedied soon. I think it's gonna make things a lot better for everyone.

  • http://thehappymedic.com the Happy Medic

    Indeed it will scare the pants off of those hiding in our ranks who lie on their charts. amazing how every BP is 128/72 and resps of 16, even on the CPR pt. We tested the E series and ran it through some tests on the set of Chronicles with the Zoll rep there to field our questions.
    The NIBP is a bell and whistle I wouldn’t use unless mandated, I prefer to trend it myself, same as pulse and resp rate. I don’t care if the triage nurse only sees the machine, not the pt, the pt is still my responsibility.

    The linking with the monitor will help QA confirm we are indeed defibbing when indicated and will actually lead, if interpreted properly, to more skills since we could prove to our MDs we have a handle on what we’re doing already.

    Keep us up to date on what you think and be honest, Zoll is listening.
    HM

  • SeanEddy

    You make a great point. We have our select medics that feel that protocolsare merely a suggestion. While they may be good at what they do, it won'tamount to anything when placed in front of a judge.We also have the abilities to transmit, but like you, we are also waiting onthe hospitals.

  • http://thehappymedic.com the Happy Medic

    Indeed it will scare the pants off of those hiding in our ranks who lie on their charts. amazing how every BP is 128/72 and resps of 16, even on the CPR pt. We tested the E series and ran it through some tests on the set of Chronicles with the Zoll rep there to field our questions.The NIBP is a bell and whistle I wouldn't use unless mandated, I prefer to trend it myself, same as pulse and resp rate. I don't care if the triage nurse only sees the machine, not the pt, the pt is still my responsibility.The linking with the monitor will help QA confirm we are indeed defibbing when indicated and will actually lead, if interpreted properly, to more skills since we could prove to our MDs we have a handle on what we're doing already.Keep us up to date on what you think and be honest, Zoll is listening.HM